Sjors
commented at 4:16 PM on October 18, 2022:
member
Looks like I need to set the correct yellow color.
jarolrod
commented at 7:03 AM on October 19, 2022:
contributor
we have actual ico files under res for the main and testnet icons, you would need to introduce a bitcoin_signet.ico with the correct yellow hue applied under src/qt/res in order to introduce the correct icon.
Looking ahead, I'd like to move away from having these different launchers to being able to select the chain from within the gui.
Sjors
commented at 10:56 AM on October 20, 2022:
member
Looking ahead, I'd like to move away from having these different launchers to being able to select the chain from within the gui
That might run into objections, see discussion in #signet
DrahtBot
commented at 2:36 PM on October 22, 2022:
contributor
If your review is incorrectly listed, please react with 👎 to this comment and the bot will ignore it on the next update.
<!--174a7506f384e20aa4161008e828411d-->
Conflicts
Reviewers, this pull request conflicts with the following ones:
#31042 (build: Rename PACKAGE_* variables to CLIENT_* by hebasto)
If you consider this pull request important, please also help to review the conflicting pull requests. Ideally, start with the one that should be merged first.
Sjors
commented at 4:46 PM on February 6, 2023:
member
On my list to rebase, fix the icon color, and reduce potential confusion. I have a Windows setup now.
Sjors force-pushed on Feb 21, 2023
Sjors
commented at 11:27 AM on February 21, 2023:
member
I added the word "test" to the application name.
Since Bitcoin Inquisition uses the default Signet to deploy several proposed soft forks, I think it's useful to offer easier access (which requires the Inquisition folks to rebase after this is merged).
The big icon looks correct, but the mini version in the search result does not. I probably need to change the ImageMagick command somehow. I could also try using the Testnet icon as the basis (and rotate the hue in the other direction).
Sjors force-pushed on Feb 21, 2023
Sjors marked this as ready for review on Feb 21, 2023
Sjors
commented at 1:23 PM on February 21, 2023:
member
I think I found the right incantation, using the high res PNG as input:
I noticed that testnet has 4 icon resolutions, which I've used for signet too. But mainnet has 9. I could regenerate that one, but it would only save 11kb.
ghost
commented at 4:55 PM on February 21, 2023:
none
Most users won't know what "signet" means, and it isn't self-explanatory like "testnet"...
Most users wont use it and it just helps devs and power users on windows. They know what signet means. Everyone else clicking on it is same as downloading a malware instead of bitcoin core which is not something this repo needs to solve. First match in search is always "bitcoin core (mainnet)" and even that would open other network if bitcoin.conf has other network set.
So this NACK makes no sense for windows users.
I added the word "test" to the application name.
Since Bitcoin Inquisition uses the default Signet to deploy several proposed soft forks, I think it's useful to offer easier access (which requires the Inquisition folks to rebase after this is merged).
The big icon looks correct, but the mini version in the search result does not. I probably need to change the ImageMagick command somehow. I could also try using the Testnet icon as the basis (and rotate the hue in the other direction).
NACK for "test signet"
signet already helps to know its NOT mainnet
Sjors
commented at 5:47 PM on February 21, 2023:
member
I don't see any harm in adding the word "test". A user who searches "bitcoin" will see the "signet" entry in their search results and wonder what it is, perhaps even worry about it. Without the word "test" the only two ways to figure out are to google "what is signet" or to launch the application.
I don't expect most users to know what "mainnet" is. They obviously know what Bitcoin is, but they may not know that one or more test networks exist.
ghost
commented at 5:59 PM on February 21, 2023:
none
I don't expect most users to know what "mainnet" is. They obviously know what Bitcoin is, but they may not know that one or more test networks exist.
If someone doesnt know what is mainnet they wont use bitcoin core as a wallet.
TheCharlatan
commented at 6:15 PM on April 25, 2023:
contributor
Concept ACK
michaelfolkson
commented at 7:31 PM on April 25, 2023:
none
Concept ACK
Perhaps the Bitcoin Design community will have a view on the wording. I'd go with standalone "signet" but I haven't done any user research on whether this isn't sufficiently informative.
DrahtBot added the label CI failed on May 29, 2023
DrahtBot removed the label CI failed on May 31, 2023
Can just reuse the testnet icon to save 43.4kB in the git repo? Doesn't seem worth it to burden every clone forever just so that a color in a test-only picture is of a slightly different tone.
Then, it would be better to have a tiny script in the build process to create the .ico, no? This would make it reproducible, documented and easily modifiable, without on each modification bloating the git repo by 50kb
The incantation is in the commit message. Adding a script makes sense, but I'm not familiar enough with the (native) build tools to know where to add it. This particular command would also add a dependency to imagemagick (if we don't use it already), though I'm sure the operation can be done with other tools if needed.
Seems better to do in a followup and generate the testnet icon that way too.
maflcko approved
maflcko
commented at 9:36 AM on August 8, 2023:
member
Seems fine. Left comments
Sjors force-pushed on Aug 14, 2023
DrahtBot added the label CI failed on Jan 13, 2024
Sjors force-pushed on Feb 13, 2024
maflcko
commented at 1:02 PM on February 13, 2024:
member
On a second thought, I wonder what the target audience is. Someone aware of a test network, and wanting to use it, should be able to create a shortcut themselves? Creating the shortcut should be the easiest of their problems to get started with a test network.
Sjors
commented at 1:20 PM on February 13, 2024:
member
Creating a shortcut is easy, but creating an icon with a non-confusing color is not.
Sjors
commented at 1:24 PM on February 13, 2024:
member
I would also expect not-super-tech-savy people to be testing applications on custom signets, e.g. testing a vault GUI on Inquisition. I would hope they don't use Windows of course :-)
DrahtBot removed the label CI failed on Feb 13, 2024
achow101
commented at 4:00 PM on April 9, 2024:
member
The PR didn't seem to attract much attention in the past. Also, the issue seems not important enough right now to keep it sitting around idle in the list of open PRs.
Closing due to lack of interest.
achow101 closed this on Apr 9, 2024
Sjors
commented at 5:28 PM on April 9, 2024:
member
Regarding the word "test": there are scammers selling signet coins, so it seems important to emphasize
achow101 reopened this on Apr 9, 2024
laanwj requested review from laanwj on Apr 14, 2024
laanwj
commented at 9:28 AM on April 14, 2024:
member
Concept ACK, i think it's important that signet gets its own launch icon if testnet has, it's more useful for testing than testnet. The other option would be to keep only the mainnet icon. But i think there's value in making windows users aware of these kind of things (so they don't reinvent wheels, or, test on mainnet 😅 ).
BrandonOdiwuor
commented at 4:18 PM on April 15, 2024:
contributor
Concept ACK
DrahtBot added the label Needs rebase on Sep 2, 2024
Add Signet launch shortcut for Windows
cd src/qt/res/icons
convert bitcoin.png -modulate 100,87,119.4 -define icon:auto-resize="256,48,32,16" bitcoin_signet.ico
This commit also removes the 64-bit mention from testnet.
77b2923f87
Add Testnet4 launch shortcut for Windowscfd03de965
Sjors force-pushed on Sep 3, 2024
Sjors
commented at 8:34 AM on September 3, 2024:
member
Rebased for CMake (dropping src/Makefile.qt.include) and added a testnet4 shortcut.
Sjors renamed this: Add Signet launch shortcut for Windows Add Signet and testnet4 launch shortcuts for Windows on Sep 3, 2024
DrahtBot removed the label Needs rebase on Sep 3, 2024
achow101
commented at 10:43 PM on September 3, 2024:
member
ACKcfd03de965a081facbd72316c76603dd7aa511bd
Did not test, but the code matches the pattern used for the other networks.
DrahtBot requested review from TheCharlatan on Sep 3, 2024
DrahtBot requested review from BrandonOdiwuor on Sep 3, 2024
achow101 removed review request from BrandonOdiwuor on Oct 15, 2024
achow101 requested review from hebasto on Oct 15, 2024
laanwj
commented at 8:42 AM on October 16, 2024:
member
\
DrahtBot requested review from BrandonOdiwuor on Oct 16, 2024
laanwj approved
laanwj
commented at 8:42 AM on October 16, 2024:
member
ACKcfd03de965a081facbd72316c76603dd7aa511bd
TheCharlatan approved
TheCharlatan
commented at 1:48 PM on October 21, 2024:
contributor
ACKcfd03de965a081facbd72316c76603dd7aa511bd
fanquake merged this on Oct 21, 2024
fanquake closed this on Oct 21, 2024
bitcoin deleted a comment on Oct 21, 2024
hebasto
commented at 2:41 PM on October 22, 2024:
member
This is a metadata mirror of the GitHub repository
bitcoin/bitcoin.
This site is not affiliated with GitHub.
Content is generated from a GitHub metadata backup.
generated: 2026-05-19 06:53 UTC