Fix typos #9651

pull practicalswift wants to merge 1 commits into bitcoin:master from practicalswift:typos changing 7 files +9 −9
  1. practicalswift commented at 5:08 PM on January 29, 2017: contributor

    A new round of typo fixes :-)

  2. practicalswift cross-referenced this on Jan 29, 2017 from issue [trivial] Fix typos in comments by practicalswift
  3. fanquake added the label Docs and Output on Jan 29, 2017
  4. fanquake commented at 5:16 PM on January 29, 2017: member

    You need to submit secp256k1 changes upstream.

  5. Fix typos 5f62e3eb63
  6. practicalswift force-pushed on Jan 29, 2017
  7. practicalswift commented at 5:25 PM on January 29, 2017: contributor

    Typo fixes in src/secp256k1/ now excluded!

  8. practicalswift commented at 5:28 PM on January 29, 2017: contributor

    @fanquake Is https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1 the correct upstream repo for secp256k1?

  9. fanquake commented at 5:29 PM on January 29, 2017: member

    https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1

    On Sun, 29 Jan 2017 at 17:27, practicalswift notifications@github.com wrote:

    @fanquake https://github.com/fanquake Perhaps a stupid question, but what is the correct upstream repo for secp256k1?

    — You are receiving this because you were mentioned.

    Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9651#issuecomment-275930021, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA0t8s23XXvjxBcgpBGFbjlH5gvstXuaks5rXMvngaJpZM4Lw16e .

  10. practicalswift commented at 5:38 PM on January 29, 2017: contributor
  11. MarcoFalke commented at 6:13 PM on January 29, 2017: member

    If you have more typos to fix or plan to do so, please include all typo fixes in a single commit in this pull. This will aid review, whereas multiple successive or parallel pull request to fix typos will distract reviewers.

  12. practicalswift commented at 6:55 PM on January 29, 2017: contributor

    @MarcoFalke The only remaining typo fixes I have in store pertain to:

    • contrib/debian/changelog
    • doc/release-notes/

    Are these of interest or is the policy to keep release notes/changelogs frozen post-release?

  13. fanquake commented at 7:47 AM on January 30, 2017: member

    We haven't been modifying old changelogs in this repo. On Sun, 29 Jan 2017 at 18:55, practicalswift notifications@github.com wrote:

    @MarcoFalke https://github.com/MarcoFalke The only remaining typo fixes I have in store pertain to:

    • contrib/debian/changelog
    • doc/release-notes/

    Are these of interest of should release notes/changelogs be frozen post-release?

    — You are receiving this because you were mentioned.

    Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9651#issuecomment-275936690, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA0t8h4pgCxsWnOt7FvxWYNB6DAXXVsMks5rXOC1gaJpZM4Lw16e .

  14. laanwj commented at 12:01 PM on January 31, 2017: member

    Are these of interest or is the policy to keep release notes/changelogs frozen post-release?

    Historical changelog entries shouldn't be changed. If there is a critical mistake that can lead to funds loss of anyone reading it, or exploitable behavior, I'm sure an exception could be made. But not for typos.

  15. practicalswift commented at 6:35 PM on January 31, 2017: contributor

    @laanwj Sounds reasonable! :-) I'll skip submitting the changelog typo PR

  16. unknown approved
  17. laanwj merged this on Feb 6, 2017
  18. laanwj closed this on Feb 6, 2017

  19. laanwj referenced this in commit 986ba005ed on Feb 6, 2017
  20. practicalswift commented at 1:22 PM on February 6, 2017: contributor

    @laanwj Thanks for merging! We are now officially typo free :-)

  21. laanwj commented at 1:51 PM on February 6, 2017: member

    @practicalswift Good! :)

  22. practicalswift commented at 2:18 PM on February 6, 2017: contributor

    @laanwj Whoops, was to quick for that announcement. Found some newly introduced typos. These are submitted in #9696.

  23. codablock referenced this in commit 207e9ec7bc on Jan 19, 2018
  24. codablock referenced this in commit 81eeb0dee7 on Jan 23, 2018
  25. andvgal referenced this in commit 55f3bf24eb on Jan 6, 2019
  26. CryptoCentric referenced this in commit 3a01a10bfe on Feb 27, 2019
  27. practicalswift deleted the branch on Apr 10, 2021
  28. bitcoin locked this on Aug 16, 2022

github-metadata-mirror

This is a metadata mirror of the GitHub repository bitcoin/bitcoin. This site is not affiliated with GitHub. Content is generated from a GitHub metadata backup.
generated: 2026-05-20 06:55 UTC