[doc] Release notes update for 0.12 #7421

pull sdaftuar wants to merge 1 commits into bitcoin:0.12 from sdaftuar:release-notes-update-12 changing 1 files +35 −4

sdaftuar commented at 2:50 PM on January 26, 2016: member

No description provided.
sdaftuar commented at 2:55 PM on January 26, 2016: member

@jonasschnelli Let me know if I got the banlist stuff right...

in doc/release-notes.md:None in 8691c39819 outdated

 159 | +(only subsequent replacements, which other nodes on the network that implement
 160 | +BIP 125 are likely to relay and mine).  Wallet users wishing to detect whether
 161 | +a transaction is subject to replacement under BIP 125 should instead use the
 162 | +updated RPC calls `gettransaction` and `listtransactions`, which now have an
 163 | +additional field in the output indicating if a transaction is replaceable under
 164 | +BIP125 ("bip125-replaceable")".

MarcoFalke commented at 3:34 PM on January 26, 2016:

Nit: trailing "?

sdaftuar commented at 3:37 PM on January 26, 2016:

Oops, thanks for catching, will fix.

MarcoFalke commented at 3:35 PM on January 26, 2016: member

ACK 8691c39

doc: Update release notes for 0.12

Update and reword BIP 125 section

Mention changes to banlist (clearbanned/setban)

Pruning nodes can relay

65d384fe82

sdaftuar force-pushed on Jan 26, 2016
sdaftuar commented at 3:41 PM on January 26, 2016: member

Fixed @MarcoFalke's nit and squashed
jonasschnelli commented at 7:09 PM on January 26, 2016: contributor

ACK! Thanks @sdaftuar for the banlist part! It short and perfect.
MarcoFalke commented at 9:16 PM on January 26, 2016: member

re-ACK 65d384f. I appreciate that this is addressing my concern from #7391. (Expose the option to non-miners)
achow101 commented at 9:47 PM on January 26, 2016: member

ACK
petertodd commented at 1:13 AM on January 27, 2016: contributor

utACK https://github.com/sdaftuar/bitcoin/commit/65d384fe82fcfbe060f1c4884572cf9439c9f840

I'll do a separate pull-req for it, but I think the release notes need to make clear that opt-in or not, unconfirmed transactions are easy to replace. (see https://petertodd.org/2016/are-wallets-ready-for-rbf)
jonasschnelli added the label Docs and Output on Jan 27, 2016
fanquake commented at 9:06 AM on January 27, 2016: member

ACK sdaftuar@65d384f
laanwj commented at 9:25 AM on January 27, 2016: member

ACK 65d384f, thanks for writing this
laanwj merged this on Jan 27, 2016
laanwj closed this on Jan 27, 2016
laanwj referenced this in commit 568c32411d on Jan 27, 2016
steven-bloom cross-referenced this on Nov 29, 2017 from issue Some instructions required by steven-bloom
bitcoin locked this on Sep 8, 2021

Contributors

Labels

Linked (view graph)

#7391 [init] Clarify help message