To avoid the need for libsecp256k1 to expose such functionality.
Do signature-s negation inside the tests #5256
pull sipa wants to merge 1 commits into bitcoin:master from sipa:secpbla changing 5 files +52 −7-
sipa commented at 1:02 PM on November 10, 2014: member
-
f4e0aefadc
Do signature-s negation inside the tests
To avoid the need for libsecp256k1 to expose such functionality.
- sipa force-pushed on Nov 10, 2014
- sipa cross-referenced this on Nov 10, 2014 from issue Use libsecp256k1 for signing operations by sipa
- sipa cross-referenced this on Nov 10, 2014 from issue Deterministic signatures by sipa
- sipa cross-referenced this on Nov 10, 2014 from issue Demo merge of libsecp256k1 and deterministic signing by sipa
-
gmaxwell commented at 11:22 PM on November 10, 2014: contributor
ACK. I prefer this approach.
-
laanwj commented at 3:55 PM on November 12, 2014: member
Sure, if we only need this in the tests, the proper place is the tests. ACK.
- laanwj added the label Tests on Nov 12, 2014
- sipa cross-referenced this on Nov 12, 2014 from issue API BREAKAGE: add a lows flag to secp256k1_ecdsa_sign by theuni
- sipa merged this on Nov 12, 2014
- sipa closed this on Nov 12, 2014
- sipa referenced this in commit 60672a61ff on Nov 12, 2014
- bitcoin locked this on Sep 8, 2021
