test: Bump timeouts to accomodate really slow disks #18249

pull MarcoFalke wants to merge 1 commits into bitcoin:master from MarcoFalke:2003-testTimeout changing 2 files +4 −4
  1. MarcoFalke commented at 9:26 PM on March 2, 2020: member

    Needed these patches locally for some arm machines with slow storage

  2. test: Bump timeouts to accomodate really slow disks fa6df0de53
  3. fanquake added the label Tests on Mar 2, 2020
  4. DrahtBot commented at 10:17 PM on March 2, 2020: contributor

    <!--e57a25ab6845829454e8d69fc972939a-->

    The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers.

    <!--174a7506f384e20aa4161008e828411d-->

    Conflicts

    Reviewers, this pull request conflicts with the following ones:

    • #16333 (test: Set BIP34Height = 2 for regtest by MarcoFalke)
    • #10102 ([experimental] Multiprocess bitcoin by ryanofsky)

    If you consider this pull request important, please also help to review the conflicting pull requests. Ideally, start with the one that should be merged first.

  5. DrahtBot cross-referenced this on Mar 3, 2020 from issue test: Set BIP34Height = 2 for regtest by MarcoFalke
  6. DrahtBot cross-referenced this on Mar 3, 2020 from issue Multiprocess bitcoin by ryanofsky
  7. Empact commented at 1:17 PM on March 3, 2020: member

    Random alternative notion: what would you think of adding a command-line option that increases the wait_until timeouts by a factor? That would allow the longer timeouts to be opt-in.

  8. MarcoFalke commented at 7:13 PM on March 4, 2020: member

    I wouldn't mind that, but I'd prefer to do this as a follow-up

  9. practicalswift commented at 11:09 PM on March 4, 2020: contributor

    ACK fa6df0de538c15a6d393830af373ac9af6f48125

  10. fanquake approved
  11. fanquake commented at 7:06 AM on March 5, 2020: member

    ACK fa6df0de538c15a6d393830af373ac9af6f48125

  12. fanquake merged this on Mar 5, 2020
  13. fanquake closed this on Mar 5, 2020

  14. fanquake cross-referenced this on Mar 5, 2020 from issue test: add option to functional test_runner to adjust test timeouts by fanquake
  15. fanquake commented at 7:07 AM on March 5, 2020: member

    Random alternative notion: what would you think of adding a command-line option that increases the wait_until timeouts by a factor? That would allow the longer timeouts to be opt-in.

    Opened #18266 for this.

  16. MarcoFalke deleted the branch on Mar 5, 2020
  17. sidhujag referenced this in commit 5d70ed3e4d on Mar 5, 2020
  18. MarkLTZ cross-referenced this on Apr 4, 2020 from issue Bitcoin PR tracking by MarkLTZ
  19. rajarshimaitra cross-referenced this on May 31, 2020 from issue test: changing signature of wait_until(). by rajarshimaitra
  20. jasonbcox referenced this in commit ccf7c08cbf on Nov 2, 2020
  21. sidhujag referenced this in commit e64ceba852 on Nov 10, 2020
  22. bitcoin locked this on Feb 15, 2022

github-metadata-mirror

This is a metadata mirror of the GitHub repository bitcoin/bitcoin. This site is not affiliated with GitHub. Content is generated from a GitHub metadata backup.
generated: 2026-05-20 06:54 UTC