The getdescriptorinfo RPC was added in #15368, this PR adds some tests.
qa: Add getdescriptorinfo functional test #15443
pull promag wants to merge 1 commits into bitcoin:master from promag:2019-02-qa-feature-descriptor changing 2 files +66 −0-
promag commented at 3:21 PM on February 19, 2019: member
-
in test/functional/test_runner.py:193 in 11778c8fd5 outdated
189 | @@ -190,6 +190,7 @@ 190 | 'rpc_help.py', 191 | 'feature_help.py', 192 | 'feature_shutdown.py', 193 | + 'feature_descriptor.py',
MarcoFalke commented at 3:25 PM on February 19, 2019:According to the naming guide, this should be rpc_descriptor?
promag commented at 3:30 PM on February 19, 2019:Descriptor is not a RPC thing is it?
Sjors commented at 4:22 PM on February 19, 2019:Or
rpc_getdescriptorinfo
MarcoFalke commented at 3:10 AM on March 10, 2020:@promag Are you going to rename this or not. If not I will merge as is.
promag commented at 8:14 AM on March 10, 2020:Renamed to rpc_getdescriptorinfo.py.
Sjors approvedSjors commented at 4:33 PM on February 19, 2019: membertACK 11778c on macOS 10.14.3.
We should distinguish two reasons for having test descriptors:
- To test the command output (make sure no fields are missing, all error RPC error conditions are covered)
- To test
descsum_createi.e. the Python implementation of descriptor checksums.
(2) probably deserves a seperate test that is called by
test_runnerbut otherwise doesn't need any of the framework. On the other hand, just adding it this test file seems fine too.It could be useful to put a bunch of test descriptors in a single JSON file to reuse between tests and to make it easier for other projects to borrow.
fanquake added the label Tests on Feb 19, 2019jonasschnelli commented at 5:55 AM on February 20, 2019: contributorMore tests are always good. Thanks for adding. Concept AcK
practicalswift commented at 7:18 PM on February 20, 2019: contributorConcept ACK
Thanks for adding!
DrahtBot commented at 1:16 AM on June 9, 2019: contributor<!--e57a25ab6845829454e8d69fc972939a-->
The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers.
<!--174a7506f384e20aa4161008e828411d-->
Conflicts
No conflicts as of last run.
jachiang commented at 11:39 AM on July 1, 2019: contributor@promag I looked into this PR in preparation for the PR Review Club IRC session later this week hosted by John and Harding and had a couple questions or thoughts:
I believe the RPC test does not cover a case where no checksum is appended to the output descriptor? Currently,EDIT: I realize the test covers descriptors with and without checksum.test_descwill append a checksum to every descriptor literal. Could we extendtest_descparameters to allow for such a test: e.g.def test_desc(self, desc, *appendchecksum*, isrange, issolvable, hasprivatekeys):It would seem that we could cover a case with
hasprivatekeys=Truee.g.wpkh(WIF)#checksumorwsh(multi(1, XPRV/1/0/*, XPUB/0/0/*))#checksumHow would aEDIT: Perhaps add addr(ADDR)/raw(HEX) inputs forissolvable=Falsereturn differ from anInvalid descriptorerror? I am sure there is a distinction which eludes me. In any case, would it make sense to cover an unsolvable descriptor?issolvable=Falsecoverage?
Thanks for adding this test.
meshcollider commented at 1:33 AM on January 17, 2020: contributorutACK 11778c8fd5cc13fcbcbc746ea1ca7ddef13a7de3
As mentioned above, it would be good to include some tests where
hasprivatekeys=TrueDrahtBot cross-referenced this on Mar 2, 2020 from issue Serve BIP 157 compact filters by jimpoDrahtBot closed this on Mar 9, 2020DrahtBot commented at 8:34 PM on March 9, 2020: contributor<!--5d09a71f8925f3f132321140b44b946d-->The last travis run for this pull request was 384 days ago and is thus outdated. To trigger a fresh travis build, this pull request should be closed and re-opened.
DrahtBot reopened this on Mar 9, 2020promag force-pushed on Mar 10, 2020qa: Add getdescriptorinfo functional test cbf2d75d8fpromag force-pushed on Mar 10, 2020MarcoFalke merged this on Mar 10, 2020MarcoFalke closed this on Mar 10, 2020promag deleted the branch on Mar 10, 2020MarkLTZ cross-referenced this on Apr 4, 2020 from issue Bitcoin PR tracking by MarkLTZFabcien referenced this in commit a34d598eb4 on Jan 6, 2021bitcoin locked this on Feb 15, 2022
This is a metadata mirror of the GitHub repository bitcoin/bitcoin. This site is not affiliated with GitHub. Content is generated from a GitHub metadata backup.
generated: 2026-05-19 06:54 UTC